To consider the position of politics within this productive process, this paper examines Archer conceptualization of human agency within her book, Realist Social Theory: This comparative theoretical account, therefore, does not provide a traditional critique of one conceptualization by another.
Description Might creolization offer political theory an approach that would better reflect the heterogeneity of political life? After all, it describes mixtures that were not supposed to have emerged in the plantation societies of Rousseau comparison arendt Caribbean but did so through their capacity to exemplify living culture, thought, and political practice.
While indebted to comparative political theory, Gordon offers a critique of comparison by demonstrating the generative capacity of creolizing methodologies. She does so by bringing together the eighteenth-century revolutionary Swiss thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the twentieth-century Martinican-born Algerian liberationist Frantz Fanon.
While both provocatively challenged whether we can study the world in ways that do not duplicate the prejudices that sustain its inequalities, Fanon, she argues, outlined a vision of how to bring into being the democratically legitimate alternatives that Rousseau mainly imagined.
Reviews This book offers a fresh perspective on the concept of creolization and on salient debates in political theory concerning multiculturalism, comparative analysis, trans nationalism, and globalization, just to name a few; it therefore makes an important contribution to the field of political theory, as well as to many others.
An unexpected encounter between Rousseau, eighteen-century Swiss-born philosopher, and Fanon, twentieth-century psychiatrist and political visionary of Caribbean origin, is theory from the North meeting theory from the South.
And thinking with creolization, a multifaceted notion with a history of crossing boundaries, opens new challenges for political studies as it does for other human sciences. Jane Anna Gordon is an incisive guide to its potential.
Through its creolized and highly nuanced reading of Rousseau - through Fanon - on the challenges confronting the practice of politics in the modern age, this work succeeds in taking both political theory and creole theory in new and enlightening directions. Further, it demonstrates ever so clearly the valuable contributions that Africana political theory can make to core concerns of Western political theory.
A must read for scholars in the fields of political theory, Africana thought, and creole theory.CLI’s Recommended Sources Hundreds of different men and women have made valuable contributions to the richness of modern philosophy and thought.
The CLT in particular draws on sources that have helped shape the course of Western intellectual thought, . In comparison, Jean Jacques Rousseau () most often expounded on his view that science, art, and social institutions have corrupted humankind and that the natural, or primitive, state is morally superior to the civilized state.
Rousseau Comparison Arendt Essay and being governed but they express them threw different viewpoints. Rousseau and Arendt use slavery as examples to prove their main points in their writings, however there examples vary from each other.
The term state formation is most commonly used to describe the long-term processes which led to the genesis of modern political domination in form of the territorial sovereign state. In a few works, the terms statebuilding, nation-building, or institution-building are used synonymously with state.
Comparison of Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau - While Hobbes and Rousseau address many of the same issues and topics in both The Leviathan as well as The Discourses, the way that Hobbes and Rousseau look at these issues such as, human nature, the state, and inequality are extremely different from each other.
Might creolization offer political theory an approach that would better reflect the heterogeneity of political life? After all, it describes mixtures that we.